期刊名称：Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics
印刷版ISSN：1893-3211
出版年度：2012
卷号：1
期号：1
页码：101-130
DOI：10.7557/1.1.1.2294
出版社：University of Tromsø
摘要：This study focuses on reported speech in two different genres: spoken conversation and newspaper articles.There are two basic structures that allow language users to report formerly uttered words: direct and indirect speech.Both structures serve to integrate former discourse into the ongoing discourse.In different genres, however, language users draw upon different language tools to meet their communicative aims.This study examines how this might affect the distribution of direct and indirect reports across conversations and newspaper articles.Two of various hypotheses that have been suggested for the different uses of direct and indirect reported speech are examined using qualitative and quantitative analyses: 1) that direct speech would be a ‘less complex' strategy than indirect speech, in the sense that the reporter does not need to make deictic adaptations if we take the ‘original' words as our starting point, and 2) that direct speech is a more involving strategy than indirect speech.While the statistical results confirm both hypotheses, the confirmation of the complexity hypothesis differs for the two genres studied and needs some refinement as will be show with further qualitative analyses.
其他摘要：This study focuses on reported speech in two different genres: spoken conversation and newspaper articles. There are two basic structures that allow language users to report formerly uttered words: direct and indirect speech. Both structures serve to integrate former discourse into the ongoing discourse. In different genres, however, language users draw upon different language tools to meet their communicative aims. This study examines how this might affect the distribution of direct and indirect reports across conversations and newspaper articles. Two of various hypotheses that have been suggested for the different uses of direct and indirect reported speech are examined using qualitative and quantitative analyses: 1) that direct speech would be a ‘less complex' strategy than indirect speech, in the sense that the reporter does not need to make deictic adaptations if we take the ‘original' words as our starting point, and 2) that direct speech is a more involving strategy than indirect speech. While the statistical results confirm both hypotheses, the confirmation of the complexity hypothesis differs for the two genres studied and needs some refinement as will be show with further qualitative analyses.
