期刊名称：THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
印刷版ISSN：2171-679X
出版年度：2007
卷号：22
期号：1
页码：93-110
DOI：10.1387/theoria.484
语种：English
出版社：UPV/EHU - University of the Basque Country
摘要：This article takes as its starting-point that a viable account of concept acquisition must be ontogenetically sound, and analyses in detail two alternative accounts of concept acquisition, one conceptualist and the other non-conceptualist, concluding that the conceptualist account is to be preferred.
