首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月03日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Grounded Theory Method: Sociology's Quest for Exclusive Items of Inquiry
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Edward Tolhurst
  • 期刊名称:Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research
  • 印刷版ISSN:1438-5627
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:3
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research
  • 摘要:The genesis and development of grounded theory method (GTM) is evaluated with reference to sociology's attempt to demarcate exclusive referents of inquiry. The links of objectivist GTM to positivistic terminology and to the natural scientific distinction from "common sense" are explored. It is then considered how the biological sciences have prompted reorientation towards constructivist GTM, underpinned by the metaphysics of social constructionism. GTM has been shaped by the endeavor to attain the sense of exactitude associated with positivism, whilst also seeking exclusive referents of inquiry that are distinct from the empirical realm of the natural sciences. This has generated complex research techniques underpinned by tortuous methodological debate: eschewing the perceived requirement to define and defend an academic niche could help to facilitate the development of a more useful and pragmatic orientation to qualitative social research. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203261
  • 其他摘要:The genesis and development of grounded theory method (GTM) is evaluated with reference to sociology's attempt to demarcate exclusive referents of inquiry. The links of objectivist GTM to positivistic terminology and to the natural scientific distinction from "common sense" are explored. It is then considered how the biological sciences have prompted reorientation towards constructivist GTM, underpinned by the metaphysics of social constructionism. GTM has been shaped by the endeavor to attain the sense of exactitude associated with positivism, whilst also seeking exclusive referents of inquiry that are distinct from the empirical realm of the natural sciences. This has generated complex research techniques underpinned by tortuous methodological debate: eschewing the perceived requirement to define and defend an academic niche could help to facilitate the development of a more useful and pragmatic orientation to qualitative social research.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203261
  • 关键词:grounded theory method;natural sciences;positivism;social constructionism;symbolic interactionism;método de teoría fundamentada;ciencias naturales;positivismo;construccionismo social;interaccionismo simbólico;Grounded-Theory-Methodologie;Naturwissenschaft;Positivismus;Sozialkonstruktionismus;symbolischer Interaktionismus
  • 其他关键词:sociology;grounded theory method; natural sciences; positivism; social constructionism; symbolic interactionism
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有