摘要：Normal 0 21 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Normal 0 21 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} In this study, we aimed at comparing physical growth and body fat (BF %) among different economic–level (EL) boys and assessing results obtained from reference data. The sample consisted of 90 students, aged 11. Physical growth was assessed by means and percentiles (P 5 – P 95 ) of stature (ST) and body mass (BM). The BF % was obtained by Lohman’s equation (triceps + subscapular). The BM and ST for medium and high EL boys were higher (p < 0.05). For the high EL boys, the BF % was higher (p < 0.05) than for the low EL boys. ST and BM were similar concerning the reference data (P5 – P95). Concerning the boys, (a) only 50 % reached a great BF % for health, (b) roughly 34 % presented BF % higher than the recommended and (c) 16 % showed low BF %.
其他摘要：In this study, we aimed at comparing physical growth and body fat (BF %) among different economic–level (EL) boys and assessing results obtained from reference data. The sample consisted of 90 students, aged 11. Physical growth was assessed by means and percentiles (P5 – P95) of stature (ST) and body mass (BM). The BF % was obtained by Lohman’s equation (triceps + subscapular). The BM and ST for medium and high EL boys were higher (p < 0.05). For the high EL boys, the BF % was higher (p < 0.05) than for the low EL boys. ST and BM were similar concerning the reference data (P5 – P95). Concerning the boys, (a) only 50 % reached a great BF % for health, (b) roughly 34 % presented BF % higher than the recommended and (c) 16 % showed low BF %. Keywords: Stature - Socioeconomic Factors - Adiposity
