摘要：Had Bergson anticipated, in a 1903 paper that stated the possibility to go through the intuition of the self to the intuition of an “eternity of life”, his following works, and especially his great 1932 book, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion? Yes indeed, if nothing in his philosophical intuitive method changed during the thirty years in between. Following Jean Nabert (1941), this paper wants to show that the bergsonian philosophical method changes much in 1932, forced to abandon its immediacy and discovering mediacy.
其他摘要：Had Bergson anticipated, in a 1903 paper that stated the possibility to go through the intuition of the self to the intuition of an “eternity of life”, his following works, and especially his great 1932 book, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion? Yes indeed, if nothing in his philosophical intuitive method changed during the thirty years in between. Following Jean Nabert (1941), this paper wants to show that the bergsonian philosophical method changes much in 1932, forced to abandon its immediacy and discovering mediacy.
