出版社：Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
摘要：Durante más de un siglo, el sufijo griego -μός/-μος ha sido objeto de multitud de estudios morfológicos, semánticos y comparativos. A pesar de la abundancia de la bibliografía específica, quedan todavía por aclarar no pocas cuestiones. Primero, y sorprendentemente, todavía no se ha llegado a una opinión general acerca de los criterios formales que, en los estudios morfológicos, deben presidir el análisis descriptivo de este sufijo. Segundo, la mayor parte de los estudios semánticos ofrecen sólo un sentido muy poco definido para este sufijo. Además, esos estudios tienen en cuenta un solo criterio formal (el acento) al analizar el contenido. Por último, los estudios comparativos casi sin excepción tratan de reconstruir un tipo original único en -*mo- que parece ser inadecuado para explicar la situación histórica de los substantivos griegos en -μός/-μος. Todo lo cual nos lleva a pensar que es oportuno volver sobre el tema.↓For more than a century, the Greek suffix -μός/-μος has been the subject of many morphological, semantic and comparative studies. Despite this abundant scientific literature, many questions still remain unanswered. First of all and quite strikingly, general agreement is still wanting, for morphological studies, on the formal criteria that should guide a descriptive analysis of this suffix. Secondly, many semantic studies bring out only a very vague meaning for this suffix. Furthermore, these studies generally take into account a single formal criterion (the suffixal accent) in their analysis of this meaning. Finally, comparative studies almost unanimously try to reconstruct a single original type in *- mo- which appears to be quite inappropriate in order to explain the historical situation of Greek -μός/-μος nouns. All these facts lead us to consider that the time has come to reexamine this subject.
其他摘要：For more than a century, the Greek suffix -mój/-moj has been the subject of many morphological, semantic and comparative studies. Despite this abundant scientific literature, many questions still remain unanswered. First of all and quite strikingly, general agreement is still wanting, for morphological studies, on the formal criteria that should guide a descriptive analysis of this suffix. Secondly, many semantic studies bring out only a very vague meaning for this suffix. Furthermore, these studies generally take into account a single formal criterion (the suffixal accent) in their analysis of this meaning. Finally, comparative studies almost unanimously try to reconstruct a single original type in *- mo- which appears to be quite inappropriate in order to explain the historical situation of Greek - mój / -moj nouns. All these facts lead us to consider that the time has come to reexamine this subject.
关键词：sufijo nominal; semántica del sufijo; vocabulario griego; substantivos en -mos;nominal suffix; suffix semantics; Greek vocabulary; nouns in -mos
其他关键词：nominal suffix; suffix semantics; Greek vocabulary; nouns in -mos.
