摘要：This article came to be due to concerns and beliefs about teaching Geometry and Trigonometry in Brazil. For answers to these questions, official documents such as the PCN+ and the Curriculum Guidelines for Secondary Education were consulted and reflection was discussed in topic Relevance of Theme. Using the magazine Zetetiké issue 36, we researched the papers published in the year 2010, both dissertations and theses and understood which approaches were studied by the researchers. Importantly, despite having sought all papers published in 2010, as published magazine Zetetiké, with contents about Geometry and Trigonometry, this is not an approach to art history. The intent of this study was to identify what new surveys have revealed, and if the anguish of other authors, as Pavanello (1993), are still present today.
其他摘要：This article came to be due to concerns and beliefs about teaching Geometry and Trigonometry in Brazil. For answers to these questions, official documents such as the PCN+ and the Curriculum Guidelines for Secondary Education were consulted and reflection was discussed in topic Relevance of Theme. Using the magazine Zetetiké issue 36, we researched the papers published in the year 2010, both dissertations and theses and understood which approaches were studied by the researchers. Importantly, despite having sought all papers published in 2010, as published magazine Zetetiké, with contents about Geometry and Trigonometry, this is not an approach to art history. The intent of this study was to identify what new surveys have revealed, and if the anguish of other authors, as Pavanello (1993), are still present today.
