首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月20日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Los economistas políticos clásicos: pobreza y población. Algunos de sus teóricos relevantes
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:VILLARESPE, VERÓNICA
  • 期刊名称:Problemas del desarrollo
  • 印刷版ISSN:0301-7036
  • 出版年度:2000
  • 卷号:31
  • 期号:123
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, UNAM
  • 摘要:The differences between Adam Smith and Thomas Robert Malthus on the conception of poverty are the subject of this article. These differences, in addition to being theoretical, are reflected in the conception of social policy. Smith demonstrated the power of work as the cause of wealth, Malthus the power of poverty as a cause of work. For Smith, the main feature of the poor was that they were workers, whereas for Malthus, workers were characterized by their poverty, since without it, they would lack the motivation to work. In Smith's view, poverty was relative, since in his progressive economy, the very poor would become poor, and the less poor would eventually live in a comfortable sort of poverty. The poor would tend to become very poor while the very poor would starve and even die.
  • 其他摘要:The differences between Adam Smith and Thomas Robert Malthus on the conception of poverty are the subject of this article. These differences, in addition to being theoretical, are reflected in the conception of social policy. Smith demonstrated the power of work as the cause of wealth, Malthus the power of poverty as a cause of work. For Smith, the main feature of the poor was that they were workers, whereas for Malthus, workers were characterized by their poverty, since without it, they would lack the motivation to work. In Smith's view, poverty was relative, since in his progressive economy, the very poor would become poor, and the less poor would eventually live in a comfortable sort of poverty. The poor would tend to become very poor while the very poor would starve and even die.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有