首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月08日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Validity of the RAST for evaluating evaluating anaerobic power performance as compared to Wingate test in cycling athletes
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Marcos Roberto Queiroga ; Timothy Gustavo Cavazzotto ; Keyla Yukari Katayama
  • 期刊名称:Motriz. Journal of Physical Education. UNESP
  • 印刷版ISSN:1980-6574
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:696-702
  • DOI:10.5016/6983
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:UNESP - São Paulo State University
  • 摘要:The validity of the Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) was investigated to evaluate the anaerobic power performance in Wingate test in athletes cycling. Ten mountain-bike male cyclists (28.0±7.3 years) randomly performed Wingate Test and RAST with two trials each. After several anthropometric measurements, peak power (PP), mean power (MP) and fatigue index (FI) for RAST and Wingate Test were compared by Student´s paired t-test, Pearson’s linear correlation test (r) and Bland and Altman’s plot. Results showed that, with the exception of FI (33.8±4.6% vs. 37.8±7.9%; r=0.172), significant differences were detected between the Wingate and RAST tests with regard to PP and MP. Although there was a strong correlation for PP and MP, or rather, 0.831 and 0.714 respectively, agreement of analysis between Wingate and RAST protocols was low. The above suggested that RAST was not appropriate to evaluate the performance of anaerobic power by Wingate test in the sample under analysis.
  • 其他摘要:The validity of the Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) was investigated to evaluate the anaerobic power performance in Wingate test in athletes cycling. Ten mountain-bike male cyclists (28.0±7.3 years) randomly performed Wingate Test and RAST with two trials each. After several anthropometric measurements, peak power (PP), mean power (MP) and fatigue index (FI) for RAST and Wingate Test were compared by Student´s paired t-test, Pearson’s linear correlation test (r) and Bland and Altman’s plot. Results showed that, with the exception of FI (33.8±4.6% vs. 37.8±7.9%; r=0.172), significant differences were detected between the Wingate and RAST tests with regard to PP and MP. Although there was a strong correlation for PP and MP, or rather, 0.831 and 0.714 respectively, agreement of analysis between Wingate and RAST protocols was low. The above suggested that RAST was not appropriate to evaluate the performance of anaerobic power by Wingate test in the sample under analysis.
  • 关键词:Cyclists. Mountain bike. Running-based anaerobic sprint test. Running test.;Ciclistas. Mountain Bike. RAST. Testes de corrida.
  • 其他关键词:Cyclists. Mountain bike. Running-based anaerobic sprint test. Running test.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有