期刊名称：Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
印刷版ISSN：0211-2337
电子版ISSN：1988-2564
出版年度：2013
卷号：30
期号：1
页码：11-26
DOI：10.5209/rev_ASHF.2013.v30.n1.42449
语种：Spanish
出版社：Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
摘要：Austrian revisionisim contended with classical historiography about the allegedly misunderstanding of market mechanisms by schoolmen who sought for the “just price” based on the Aristotelian conception of value. They argued that the subjective theory of value advanced by the first generation of Austrian economists was rooted in Aristotle. We claim here, although, for a biased reception of the Aristotelian conception of value among Austrian revisionists, and we suggest some clues in order to recover the genuine dimension of the Aristotelian conception of economic value.
其他摘要：Austrian revisionisim contended with classical historiography about the allegedly misunderstanding of market mechanisms by schoolmen who sought for the “just price” based on the Aristotelian conception of value. They argued that the subjective theory of value advanced by the first generation of Austrian economists was rooted in Aristotle. We claim here, although, for a biased reception of the Aristotelian conception of value among Austrian revisionists, and we suggest some clues in order to recover the genuine dimension of the Aristotelian conception of economic value.
关键词：Aristóteles;intercambio;justicia;reciprocidad;revisionismo;valor de uso;valor de cambio.
其他关键词：Aristotle;exchange;justice;reciprocity;revisionism;value in use;value in exchange.
