首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:La I Guerra Mundial y los orígenes de la Teoría de los Efectos. El caso de aliadófilos y germanófilos
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ubaldo Cuesta Cambra ; Sandra Gaspar Herrero
  • 期刊名称:Historia y Comunicación Social
  • 印刷版ISSN:1137-0734
  • 电子版ISSN:1988-3056
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:18
  • 期号:0
  • 页码:125-138
  • DOI:10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.43418
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
  • 摘要:During World War I, Spain is neutral. However, in the media there is a media battle: there is a clash between Germanophiles (those media and opinion leaders who support the German Empire) and pro-Allied (the supporters of France and the United Kingdom). This phenomenon has been studied in depth in the field of the history of communication, often linked to the history of Spanish journalism (Auvert (1983, 1986 and 1989). In this paper, we analyze this phenomenon from a different perspective. We proposed the following hypothesis: policy makers, for the first time, are really aware of the power of the media to generate public opinion trends. Then a series of measures to control these effects of media were initiated, such as grants and strategic support to different media and journalist. In that way, arise the early Theories of Communication and Effects, and therefore, the first Political Communication Theories from a positivist methodology (called Behabioralism , Kegley, 2008). The historical pathway of these development was very complex and mixed business aspects related to communication industry, ideological, cultural changes (such as the incipient emergence of the society of mass communication) and scientific aspects: especially the proposals derived from the Chicago School and Yale, where, as a result of the events of the war, they were designing the first empirical models Theories Effects (Lasswell, 1927) and Political Communication.
  • 其他摘要:During World War I, Spain is neutral. However, in the media there is a media battle: there is a clash between Germanophiles (those media and opinion leaders who support the German Empire) and pro-Allied (the supporters of France and the United Kingdom). This phenomenon has been studied in depth in the field of the history of communication, often linked to the history of Spanish journalism (Auvert (1983, 1986 and 1989). In this paper, we analyze this phenomenon from a different perspective. We proposed the following hypothesis: policy makers, for the first time, are really aware of the power of the media to generate public opinion trends. Then a series of measures to control these effects of media were initiated, such as grants and strategic support to different media and journalist. In that way, arise the early Theories of Communication and Effects, and therefore, the first Political Communication Theories from a positivist methodology (called Behabioralism , Kegley, 2008). The historical pathway of these development was very complex and mixed business aspects related to communication industry, ideological, cultural changes (such as the incipient emergence of the society of mass communication) and scientific aspects: especially the proposals derived from the Chicago School and Yale, where, as a result of the events of the war, they were designing the first empirical models Theories Effects (Lasswell, 1927) and Political Communication.
  • 关键词:World War I;pro-Allied and Germanophiles;Effects Theory; Political Communication; Psychology of Communication;I Guerra Mundial;Aliadófilos y Germanófilos;Teoría de los Efectos;Comunicación Política;Psicología de la Comunicación
  • 其他关键词:World War I; pro-Allied and Germanophiles; Effects Theory, Political Communication, Psychology of Communication
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有