首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月21日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Pionerismo relativo y autoría compartida. Mito contra Historia del cine español
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Agustín Rubio Alcover
  • 期刊名称:Historia y Comunicación Social
  • 印刷版ISSN:1137-0734
  • 电子版ISSN:1988-3056
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:18
  • 期号:0
  • 页码:307-316
  • DOI:10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.43968
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
  • 摘要:The modern historiography of the Spanish movies has tended to divide into lots, in terms of methodological and ideological options. In like manner, anti-empiricist and anti-positivist slogans have had perverse effects for an authentic knowledge of the vicissitude of our cinematography, in particular for its industry and the paper of the subjects in the evolution of the same. The present work aspires to arbitrate this debate, and to contribute a proposal of encounter, reasoned, critical, constructive and concrete. Three Spanish classical films – namely: Goyescas (Benito Perojo, 1942), La calle sin sol (Rafael Gil, 1948) and Los peces rojos (José Antonio Nieves Conde, 1955)– are used to contribute, respectively, data about the genesis of the first; the second’s technical new thing; and the authorship of the third one. With these three examples, the author indicates which is the nature of the historiographical lagoons that are, to his judgment, more urgent; reorganizes priorities; arguments the strategies that may be considered best-suited to cover those holes; and illustrates the performance that can be obtained of a well-balanced and not excluding use of the techniques and the traditional and contemporaries technologies, for a most systematic understanding of the object of study.
  • 其他摘要:The modern historiography of the Spanish movies has tended to divide into lots, in terms of methodological and ideological options. In like manner, anti-empiricist and anti-positivist slogans have had perverse effects for an authentic knowledge of the vicissitude of our cinematography, in particular for its industry and the paper of the subjects in the evolution of the same. The present work aspires to arbitrate this debate, and to contribute a proposal of encounter, reasoned, critical, constructive and concrete. Three Spanish classical films – namely: Goyescas (Benito Perojo, 1942), La calle sin sol (Rafael Gil, 1948) and Los peces rojos (José Antonio Nieves Conde, 1955)– are used to contribute, respectively, data about the genesis of the first; the second’s technical new thing; and the authorship of the third one. With these three examples, the author indicates which is the nature of the historiographical lagoons that are, to his judgment, more urgent; reorganizes priorities; arguments the strategies that may be considered best-suited to cover those holes; and illustrates the performance that can be obtained of a well-balanced and not excluding use of the techniques and the traditional and contemporaries technologies, for a most systematic understanding of the object of study.
  • 关键词:Spanish Cinema;Film History;pioneering;authorship;technology;mythology;Cine español;Historia del Cine;pionerismo;autoría;tecnología;mitología
  • 其他关键词:Spanish Cinema; Film History; pioneering; authorship; technology; mythology
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有