出版社：Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
摘要：Which mechanisms explain the growing of the public attorney’s autonomy? this paper discusses the process whereby Public Attorney acquired autonomy before state powers, since the drawing of the new Brazilian Constitution in 1987/88, and how this autonomy contributed to increase the judicialization of politics. How does the literature explain the fact that many institutions lobbied for autonomy and only public attorney had its competence expanded? a systematic theoretical review of this process is presented here to try to answer this question. The results indicate that the debate is divided between two explanatory currents. On the one hand, the autonomy of institution could be explained by the internal norms that govern it. On the other hand, it’s suggested the existence of exogenous interests that had influence in the construction of public attorney’s autonomy
其他摘要：Which mechanisms explain the growing of the public attorney’s autonomy? this paper discusses the process whereby Public Attorney acquired autonomy before state powers, since the drawing of the new Brazilian Constitution in 1987/88, and how this autonomy contributed to increase the judicialization of politics. How does the literature explain the fact that many institutions lobbied for autonomy and only public attorney had its competence expanded? a systematic theoretical review of this process is presented here to try to answer this question. The results indicate that the debate is divided between two explanatory currents. On the one hand, the autonomy of institution could be explained by the internal norms that govern it. On the other hand, it’s suggested the existence of exogenous interests that had influence in the construction of public attorney’s autonomy
关键词：democratic control;public attorney;judicialization of politics;CONTROLES DEMOCRÁTICOS;MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO;JUDICIALIZAÇÃO DA POLÍTICA
其他关键词：democratic control; public attorney; judicialization of politics
