摘要：Psychotic speech is opaque in its own terms. It therefore demands a listening that posits psychosis in the field of psychopathology instead of pathology. The analysis of the construction of the psychotic’s words of neologic effect displays a complex work of thought. Language does not surface as mere manifestation, as a tool of thought, but rather as a cause for the emergence of a subject. By unveiling how the “pathological power of language” works, the delirious construction of the neologic effect lets us picture another mode in which the psychotic inhabits language.
其他摘要：Psychotic speech is opaque in its own terms. It therefore demands a listening that posits psychosis in the field of psychopathology instead of pathology. The analysis of the construction of the psychotic’s words of neologic effect displays a complex work of thought. Language does not surface as mere manifestation, as a tool of thought, but rather as a cause for the emergence of a subject. By unveiling how the “pathological power of language” works, the delirious construction of the neologic effect lets us picture another mode in which the psychotic inhabits language.
