首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月19日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:¿Es posible ser moralmente responsable? Notas para una nueva definición del concepto de sujeto
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Vicente Raga Rosaleny
  • 期刊名称:Arbor
  • 印刷版ISSN:1988-303X
  • 出版年度:2006
  • 卷号:182
  • 期号:718
  • 页码:265-275
  • DOI:10.3989/arbor.2006.i718.28
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
  • 摘要:The Strawson´s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody could be never responsible. In this article I criticize orthodox solutions to Strawson´s sceptical challenge and show how they share with the Argument the same theological notion of monadical agent. A new solution needs a new conception of agent..
  • 关键词:Philosophy of Action;Moral Responsibility;Agent;Compatibilism;Incompatibilism;Determinism;Free Will;Social Identity;Filosofía de la acción;Responsabilidad moral;Agente;Compatibilismo;Incompatibilismo;Determinismo;Libre albedrío;Identidad social
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有