期刊名称：THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
印刷版ISSN：2171-679X
出版年度：2011
卷号：26
期号：3
页码：311-320
DOI：10.1387/theoria.2950
语种：English
出版社：UPV/EHU - University of the Basque Country
摘要：This paper highlights the difference between Lilian Bermejo-Luque’s account of warrants with the quite different accounts of warrants offered by Toulmin, Hitchcock, and myself, and lays out some of the reasons why I think a “Toulminesque” account of warrants captures crucial aspects of arguing more adequately than her account does
关键词：Grice;Hitchcock;inference claims;logical dimension of argumentation;material conditionals;modal qualifiers;relevance;Scriven;Toulmin;warrants
