首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月23日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Avaliação da adesão ao tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 1: Revisão de literatura
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Luziane Fatima Kirchner ; Maria Luiza Marinho-Casanova
  • 期刊名称:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
  • 印刷版ISSN:2236-6407
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:45-63
  • DOI:10.5433/2236-6407.2014v5n1p45
  • 语种:Portuguese
  • 出版社:Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • 摘要:This work aimed to identify methods, objectives and type of studies that assessed adherence to the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, published from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed 111 articles, collected in the survey by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that 95 studies are descriptive, with prevalence of adolescents (74 studies) and children (34 studies). It was also found that those studies that have prevailed: Used an informer (67 studies), the carrier of the disease who reported more data (72 studies), evaluated one (35 studies) or five (25 studies) treatment medical, by means of an instrument (68 studies), being standardized instruments the most used procedures in this assessment (40 studies). Data leaded to the conclusion that the methods used to assess adherence, in the studies analyzed, do not comply with the suggestions made in Literature to make the results in adherence more reliable. Discussions about this subject need to be further developed.
  • 其他摘要:This work aimed to identify methods, objectives and type of studies that assessed adherence to the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, published from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed 111 articles, collected in the survey by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that 95 studies are descriptive, with prevalence of adolescents (74 studies) and children (34 studies). It was also found that those studies that have prevailed: Used an informer (67 studies), the carrier of the disease who reported more data (72 studies), evaluated one (35 studies) or five (25 studies) treatment medical, by means of an instrument (68 studies), being standardized instruments the most used procedures in this assessment (40 studies). Data leaded to the conclusion that the methods used to assess adherence, in the studies analyzed, do not comply with the suggestions made in Literature to make the results in adherence more reliable. Discussions about this subject need to be further developed.
  • 关键词:adherence to treatment;literature review;type 1 diabetes mellitus;adherencia al tratamiento;revisión de la literatura;diabetes mellitus tipo 1;adesão ao tratamento;revisão de literatura;diabetes mellitus tipo 1
  • 其他关键词:adherence to treatment; literature review; type 1 diabetes mellitus
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有