摘要：The aim of this paper is to stick out the ontological irrelevance of the presentist/eternist debate showing meaningful cultural aspects of these currents to embrace a skeptical viewpoint. That is to say, I will defend that this debate is not ontologically genuine and that the debate remains mainly in an epistemological or pragmatic level, introducing psychological, linguistic and anthropological significant examples to outcrop the subjectivity and the mind-dependence of the issue.
