首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月07日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Differences in essential newborn care at birth between private and public health facilities in eastern Uganda
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Peter Waiswa ; Department of Health Policy, Planning ; Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
  • 期刊名称:Global Health Action
  • 印刷版ISSN:1654-9716
  • 电子版ISSN:1654-9880
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:8
  • 期号:0
  • DOI:10.3402/gha.v8.24251
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Taylor & Francis
  • 摘要:Background: In Uganda and elsewhere, the private sector provides an increasing and significant proportion of maternal and child health services. However, little is known whether private care results in better quality services and improved outcomes compared to the public sector, especially regarding care at the time of birth.Objective: To describe the characteristics of care-seekers and assess newborn care practices and services received at public and private facilities in rural eastern Uganda.Design: Within a community-based maternal and newborn care intervention with health systems strengthening, we collected data from mothers with infants at baseline and endline using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate data analysis comparing nine newborn care practices and three composite newborn care indicators among private and public health facilities was conducted.Results: The proportion of women giving birth at private facilities decreased from 25% at baseline to 17% at endline, whereas overall facility births increased. Private health facilities did not perform significantly better than public health facilities in terms of coverage of any essential newborn care interventions, and babies were more likely to receive thermal care practices in public facilities compared to private (68% compared to 60%, p=0.007). Babies born at public health facilities received an average of 7.0 essential newborn care interventions compared to 6.2 at private facilities (p<0.001). Women delivering in private facilities were more likely to have higher parity, lower socio-economic status, less education, to seek antenatal care later in pregnancy, and to have a normal delivery compared to women delivering in public facilities.Conclusions: In this setting, private health facilities serve a vulnerable population and provide access to service for those who might not otherwise have it. However, provision of essential newborn care practices was slightly lower in private compared to public facilities, calling for quality improvement in both private and public sector facilities, and a greater emphasis on tracking access to and quality of care in private sector facilities.Keywords: newborn health; private health care; public health care; essential newborn care; Uganda(Published: 31 March 2015)Citation: Glob Health Action 2015, 8: 24251 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.24251SPECIAL ISSUE: This paper is part of the Special Issue: Newborn health in Uganda. More papers from this issue can be found at http://www.globalhealthaction.net
  • 关键词:Public Health; Global Health; Health Systems;newborn health; private health care; public health care; essential newborn care; Uganda;Subclass RA
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有