首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月29日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Response to Dobson and Iftody: A Slacker Darkly? No Interpretation Without Intertextualization
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Noel Gough
  • 期刊名称:Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education
  • 印刷版ISSN:1710-5668
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:6
  • 期号:2
  • 出版社:ComplexityandEducation
  • 摘要:In ‘Consciousness and Complexity in “Waking Life”,’ Teresa Dobson and Tammy Iftody argue persuasively for interpreting Richard Linklater’s film, which deploys innovative animation techniques to portray discussions of theories of consciousness, from a complexivist perspective. They demonstrate how complexity theorizing might inform interpretive practices and recommend the film as a focus for discussion in humanities education. This response concurs with much of their analysis, but suggests that there are limitations to interpretive practices that focus on a single text, and argues for an alternative approach that deliberately foregrounds intertextuality – that is, interpreting any given text in terms of other texts. Examples of intertextual readings that produce multiple and unpredictable interpretations are provided, including interpretations of Waking Life’s intertextual relations with other films by Linklater, and with other visual and literary texts.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有