首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月06日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:What Factors Influence Where Researchers Deposit their Data? A Survey of Researchers Submitting to Data Repositories
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Shea Swauger ; Todd J. Vision
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Digital Curation
  • 印刷版ISSN:1746-8256
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:68-81
  • DOI:10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.289
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:University of Edinburgh
  • 摘要:In order to better understand the factors that most influence where researchers deposit their data when they have a choice, we collected survey data from researchers who deposited phylogenetic data in either the TreeBASE or Dryad data repositories. Respondents were asked to rank the relative importance of eight possible factors. We found that factors differed in importance for both TreeBASE and Dryad, and that the rankings differed subtly but significantly between TreeBASE and Dryad users. On average, TreeBASE users ranked the domain specialization of the repository highest, while Dryad users ranked as equal highest their trust in the persistence of the repository and the ease of its data submission process. Interestingly, respondents (particularly Dryad users) were strongly divided as to whether being directed to choose a particular repository by a journal policy or funding agency was among the most or least important factors. Some users reported depositing their data in multiple repositories and archiving their data voluntarily.
  • 其他摘要:In order to better understand the factors that most influence where researchers deposit their data when they have a choice, we collected survey data from researchers who deposited phylogenetic data in either the TreeBASE or Dryad data repositories. Respondents were asked to rank the relative importance of eight possible factors. We found that factors differed in importance for both TreeBASE and Dryad, and that the rankings differed subtly but significantly between TreeBASE and Dryad users. On average, TreeBASE users ranked the domain specialization of the repository highest, while Dryad users ranked as equal highest their trust in the persistence of the repository and the ease of its data submission process. Interestingly, respondents (particularly Dryad users) were strongly divided as to whether being directed to choose a particular repository by a journal policy or funding agency was among the most or least important factors. Some users reported depositing their data in multiple repositories and archiving their data voluntarily.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有