首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月19日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Smith Machine vs. Barbell: Ten Repetition Maximum Loads and Muscle Activation Pattern during Upper Body Exercises
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Iago Pimentel ; Iago Pimentel ; Ewertton Bezerra
  • 期刊名称:Journal of exercise physiology online
  • 印刷版ISSN:1097-9751
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:5
  • 页码:86-92
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:American Society of Exercise Physiologists
  • 摘要:Pimentel I, Bezerra E, Ceselles D, Rossato M, Machado J, Lazarri C, Paz G, Miranda H, Moro A. Smith Machine vs. Barbell: Ten Repetition Maximum Loads and Muscle Activation Pattern during Upper Body Exercises. JEPonline 2016;19(5):86-92. The aim of this study was to investigate muscle activation performance and maximum repetition test for the bench press, military press and the close-grip bench press exercises with the barbell and the Smith Machine. Twelve recreationally trained men (mean ± SD: 21.83 ± 4.5 yrs; 1.72 ± 0.1 cm; 80.3 ± 9.2 kg; 25.1 ± 2.96 kg·m -2 ; 17.3 ± 6.85 %Fat) underwent a within-subject, randomized and counterbalanced repeated-measures to analyze the 10-RM strength and muscle activation in the bench press, military press, and the close-grip bench press. Electromyographic signals were collected for the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, and triceps brachii during 1 set of each exercise with the barbell and smith machine. No difference was observed in muscle activity for pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, and triceps brachii when comparing the barbell and the Smith Machine (P>0.05). However, significant differences in 10-RM loads were observed between the barbell and the Smith Machine for the close-grip bench press and military press exercises. These finding should be important when considering the determination of training loads.
  • 关键词:Exercise;Electromyography;Resistance Training
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有