首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月03日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDIZED METHOD ON AUTOMATED MEASURING SYSTEMS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER PM10, PM2.5: FIELD VALIDATION TESTS
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Thomas Maggos ; Stella Pateraki ; Marisa Bessa
  • 期刊名称:Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
  • 印刷版ISSN:1018-4619
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:26
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:273-282
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:PSP Publishing
  • 摘要:Directive 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe sets limit values for particulate matter PM10 and PM2.5. The reference measurement methods have already been standardized (EN12341:2014), but they are manual/semi-automated methods. A standard for automated PM measurements (Article 32.3) is still missing. For that purpose, the European Commission (EC) charged the European Committee for Standardization (CEN/TC264/WG15) to elaborate a new standard for the automated measurement of Particulate Matter (PM). In the current study two different research groups tested PM automated instruments in order to check if the test criteria, listed in the draft Technical Specification CEN/TS 16450:2013, were suitable for incorporation into the draft standard. As the new standard would rely on a comparison to the reference method (RM), parallel measurements, according to EN 12341:2014, were performed during the testing period (warm and cold) using three different filter types. The results show that TEOM-FDMS overestimated PM10 at both types of environment while it passed the equivalence test when it compared to RM, for both the warm and cold period. The BAM 1020 generally agrees with the reference method that is operated with EN12341:2014 style heads and with Emfab filters. There is one data point for which the BAM significantly underestimates the reference method. The type of filters that were used (Emfab, PTFE) filters and preconditioned Whatman QMA, appeared to be very well correlated between each other for both warm and cold periods.
  • 关键词:PMx ;automated measuring method ;field test ;QA/QC
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有