首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月16日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparing the effect of mass and distributed study techniques on remembering level and its relation with the exam date
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ali Akbar Shaikhi Fini ; Ali Akbar Shaikhi Fini ; Hossain Zainalipour
  • 期刊名称:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1877-0428
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:5
  • 页码:1751-1759
  • DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.359
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractA common way of study by students is reading the studying materials over and over or “Rereading”. Rereading is a process of repeating subjects and according to time spacing between reading is divided to two main parts: first, “mass study” when there is no time spacing between subsequent reading; second, “distributed study” when the time spacing is present between two studies. In this research, the goal is to complete and generalize the previous findings in this area. They key point is to compare the efficiency of three types of studding (i.e. single study, mass rereading studding and distributed studding) based on examination results? For this, we employed six groups of twelve peoples in this study. Participants are selected randomly based on factorial combination of two independent variables. Three types of studding are considered here: single study, mass rereading study and distributed rereading study. In addition, the examinations were held on two levels: one immediately after studding and other associated with a two-day delay after studding. After the study of a given text, the remembering test was taken from students. Results show that in the immediately held test, the group who used mass studding technique had better score than the other. However, in the delayed test, the group that used distributed studding technique had better score with regard to the first group.
  • 关键词:studding techniques;mass rereading;distributed rereading;examination;two factorials variance analysis
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有