首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Online vs. Traditional Teaching Evaluation: A Cross-Sectional Study
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:M. Khorsandi ; M. Khorsandi ; A. Kobra
  • 期刊名称:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1877-0428
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:46
  • 页码:481-483
  • DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.145
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractTeaching evaluation contributed to the improvement of teaching quality and faculty's teaching skills. Faculty course evaluations have the potential to affect professional and career advancement. It is also important to medical education systems because is often used as the basis for evaluations of teaching effectiveness and improves the quality of manpower performance. This study's goal was to compare two methods of student evaluations of faculty, the traditional method versus online. This was a cross-sectional study. The study population was 658 students. The data gathering instrument was a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of faculty teaching gathered through paper-based approach or completed online. The findings showed that students preferred the online method for evaluating the quality of teaching (p<0.001) over the traditional method. Compared to traditional evaluation, online evaluation tends to have significantly greater advantages. The findings suggest that online evaluation of faculty may be a suitable alternative to the paper evaluation.
  • 关键词:Online evaluation;students;and quality of faculty teaching
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有