首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月15日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Comparative Study on Self, Peer and Teacher Evaluation to Evaluate Clinical Skills of Nursing Students
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Neda Mehrdad ; Neda Mehrdad ; Shoaleh Bigdeli
  • 期刊名称:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1877-0428
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:47
  • 页码:1847-1852
  • DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.911
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractIntroduction and purposes:Clinical Evaluation of students has been investigated during last two decades and is considered as one of the important and complicated tasks of faculty members and health program instructors. Involving students in evaluation process is an appraisal technique and a diverse resource for data gathering. Therefore, this study is an attempt to compare self, peer and clinical teacher evaluation of nursing students’ clinical skills in medical-surgical wards of selected hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2010-2011.Materials and methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study, sample selection was by census. All junior nurse students attending medical-surgical internship program were selected. Thereafter, at the end of the program, clinical skills of nurse students were evaluated by the self, peer, and clinical teacher. 68 participants (60 students and 8 clinical teachers) completed 110 evaluation forms. Data gathered through a demographic data questionnaire, and students’ standard clinical evaluation form. Descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (paired T-test and Pearson Correlation Coefficient) were used to analyze the data.Results:There was a significant difference between clinical teacher and self evaluation, and between clinical teacher and peer evaluation mean scores. However, there was no significant difference between self- and peer evaluation. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between peer and self-evaluation scores, but no significant correlation between peer and self-evaluation with teacher-evaluation.Conclusion:Since self, peer, and clinical teacher evaluation scores have no significant correlation and but a significant difference, it is indicated that self- and peer-evaluation are not suitable substitutes for clinical teacher evaluation; meanwhile, they could be applied as complementary evaluation methods to evaluate clinical performance of students.
  • 关键词:Self-evaluation;peer-evaluation;clinical teacher evaluation;nursing students
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有