首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月09日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Should a Single Clinician Examiner be used in Objective Structure Clinical Examination?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Mohd Nasri Awang Besar ; Mohd Nasri Awang Besar ; Harlina Halizah Siraj
  • 期刊名称:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1877-0428
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:60
  • 页码:443-449
  • DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.404
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractThe consistency in ratings provided by examiners can affect the reliability of the OSCE. This study was designed to identify the inter-rater reliability among examiners. This was a cross-sectional study involving 22 clinicians from all disciplines of medicine. An OSCE video was shown to each group and the examiners were to give their marks. The results showed a strong agreement among examiner in mixed discipline group (ICC=0.83), obstetrics & gynaecology group (ICC=0.84) and psychiatry group (ICC=0.88). Further analysis showed a moderate agreement among expert examiner (ICC=0.70) and non-expert examiners (ICC=0.78). We concluded that regardless the number of clinicians used as examiners in OSCE assessment, early exposure on OSCE, comprehensive training and OSCE station briefing prior to the examination are recommended.
  • 关键词:Clinical examiner;expert examiner;inter-rater reliability;OSCE
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有