摘要：Naming disorders are ubiquitous in aphasia. Understanding their origin in each subject, at each disease stage is acomplex task. Aphasic patients are heterogeneous, and clinical aphasia types do not account for observed differences.A subject’s performance may vary in time, even across back-to-back sessions. Furthermore, although at first glancenaming accuracy and error type distribution do not change substantially, we generally ignore how frequently thesame stimulus yields the same type of response across different trials.
