首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月16日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Comparison between Three-and Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Afsaneh Dehnad ; Afsaneh Dehnad ; Hayedeh Nasser
  • 期刊名称:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1877-0428
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:98
  • 页码:398-403
  • DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.432
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractTo write plausible options for multiple choice questions (MCQs) is often a demanding job for test makers. Three-option MCQs might be a solution for the process of test making as well as test taking. This study was an attempt to compare three-option MCQs with four-option in terms of test usefulness. The participants were 114 second semester medical students taking the tests as their final examination concurrently while the time of test completion was recorded. The collected data were analysed by SPSS with the use of an independent t-test. The findings showed some differences in usefulness of these two test formats.
  • 关键词:Multiple Choice Questions;test usefulness;three-option multiple choice;four-option multiple choice
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有