标题：A Study on Constructing the Order of the Teaching Materials on Apparatus Gymnastics to Learn “Spring Motion”: Focusing on the Relation between “Forward Roll Bridge” and “Spring Motion from a Higher Level”*
期刊名称：International Journal of Sport and Health Science
印刷版ISSN：1348-1509
电子版ISSN：1880-4012
出版年度：2018
卷号：16
页码：89-106
DOI：10.5432/ijshs.201802
语种：English
出版社：日本体育学会
摘要：The purpose of this study was to develop effective teaching plans for learning how to “spring” by creating lesson plans using a “forward roll bridge (FRB)” as the teaching material and analyzing the effectiveness of the lesson plans through their execution in classes.These lessons of “spring motion from a higher level (SMH)”, which were taught over 6 school hours in total, were carried out as a part of the unit on apparatus gymnastics spanning from April 15th to the 28th, 2016. Participants were 5th grade students (32 male, 31 female, 2 classes) of the F elementary school, which is located in Hiroshima prefecture. These lessons were followed by the “FRB (10 school hours in total)” lessons developed for this study, in which the students learned “the spring motion with hip subduction, from forward roll (SHF)” and aimed to do the “SMH”, landing on the ground. The F elementary school employs a subject teacher system throughout the elementary school, and the students had already learned the “antenna bridge (AB)” and the “FRB” in the previous year.The results of this study were as follows;(1) An improvement of the students' athletic skills for doing all of the moves, “AB”, “FRB”, and “SMH”, was observed after the 6 school hour lessons. It expressly indicates that the lesson plans were effective for teaching “SMH”.(2) A correlation of the achievements of “FRB” and “SMH” was found in the first lesson (|r|≦0.700, p<0.0001). This result indicates that “FRB” should be learned before “SMH”, to produce a higher achievement rate. After the 6th lesson, the correlations between “AB” and “FRB” (|r|≦0.348, p<0.006) and between “FRB” and “SMH” (|r|≦0.440, p<0.0001) were found. This might show that effectiveness of “FRB” as a move connecting the learning of “AB” and “SMH”.(3) The qualitative analysis of the students' movements indicated that there were two types of students who were not able to do “SMH”, those students who achieved “SHF” but could not do the spring, and those students who had not achieved “SHF”. This differs from former studies that showed only the latter type of students existing. This indicates that the difficulties of “SMH” were that 1) the students first need to achieve two skills, “SHF” and “pushing with hands”, and 2) the students need to adapt themselves for another situation in order to be able to do the move.
