首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月07日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Normality Assessment, a Substantial Appraisalin Medical Studies: A Simulation Study forPower Comparison of Various Types ofNormality Tests
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Hamed Tabesh ; Ahmad Heidari ; Azadeh Saki
  • 期刊名称:Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology
  • 印刷版ISSN:2457-1024
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:18
  • 页码:2646-2660
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Sciencedomain International
  • 摘要:Background: In medical research, statistical tests have become more important. Several parametric procedures are available but each of them requires normality assumption. As normality violation may affect interpretation and inferences reliability and validity, so importance of normal distribution is undeniable. Although several normality tests available for software users but the power of each test in specified situation is not clear.Methods: The aim of this study is to compare the power of nine normality tests. In this paper power of Jarque-Bera test, D’Agostino and Pearson test, Chi-square test, Kolmogrov-Smirnov test, Lilliefors test, Cramer-Von Mises test, Anderson-Darling test, Shapiro-Wilk test and Shapiro-Francia test compared via Monte Carlo simulation of sample data generated from alternative distributions that follow symmetric, skewed, skewed & heavy tailed, highly skewed and highly skewed & heavy tailed distributions.Results: Simulation study shows that Shapiro-Francia test under symmetric, skewed, skewed& heavy tailed and highly skewed& heavy tailed distributions perform better than others. Also, Shapiro-Wilk performs better when underlying distribution is skewed.Conclusion: Although, Shapiro-Francia and Shapiro-Wilk have greater power than their competitors but their powers are still low for small sample size. So their singly use is not recommended.
  • 关键词:Normality test;Power;Monte Carlo Simulation;Tukey g-and-h distribution
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有