首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月03日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Modeling forest plantations for carbon uptake with the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Braakhekke, Maarten C. ; Doelman, Jonathan C. ; Baas, Peter
  • 期刊名称:Earth System Dynamics
  • 电子版ISSN:2190-4995
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:617-630
  • DOI:10.5194/esd-10-617-2019
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Copernicus Publications
  • 摘要:Abstract. We present an extension of the dynamic global vegetation model, Lund–Potsdam–Jena Managed Land (LPJmL), tosimulate planted forests intended for carbon (C) sequestration. We implemented three functional types to simulate plantation trees in temperate, tropical, and boreal climates. The parameters of these functional types were optimized to fit target growth curves (TGCs). These curves represent the evolution of stemwood C over time in typical productive plantations and were derived by combining field observations and LPJmL estimates for equivalent natural forests. While the calibrated model underestimates stemwood C growth rates compared to the TGCs, it represents substantial improvement over using natural forests to represent afforestation. Based on a simulation experiment in which we compared global natural forest versus global forest plantation, we found that forest plantations allow for much larger C uptake rates on the timescale of 100 years, with a maximum difference of a factor of 1.9, around 54 years. In subsequent simulations for an ambitious but realistic scenario in which 650 Mha (14 % of global managed land, 4.5 % of global land surface) are converted to forest over 85 years, we found that natural forests take up 37 PgC versus 48 PgC for forest plantations. Comparing these results to estimations of C sequestration required to achieve the 2 ∘C climate target, we conclude that afforestation can offer a substantial contribution to climate mitigation. Full evaluation of afforestation as a climate change mitigation strategy requires an integrated assessment which considers all relevant aspects, including costs, biodiversity, and trade-offs with other land-use types. Our extended version of LPJmL can contribute to such an assessment by providing improved estimates of C uptake rates by forest plantations.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有