首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月29日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Model Selection Procedures in Bounds Test of Cointegration: Theoretical Comparison and Empirical Evidence
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Waqar Badshah ; Mehmet Bulut
  • 期刊名称:Economies
  • 印刷版ISSN:2227-7099
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:8
  • 期号:49
  • 页码:49
  • DOI:10.3390/economies8020049
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:MDPI, Open Access Journal
  • 摘要:Only unstructured single-path model selection techniques, i.e., Information Criteria, are used by Bounds test of cointegration for model selection. The aim of this paper was twofold; one was to evaluate the performance of these five routinely used information criteria {Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Akaike Information Criterion Corrected (AICC), Schwarz/Bayesian Information Criterion (SIC/BIC), Schwarz/Bayesian Information Criterion Corrected (SICC/BICC), and Hannan and Quinn Information Criterion (HQC)} and three structured approaches (Forward Selection, Backward Elimination, and Stepwise) by assessing their size and power properties at different sample sizes based on Monte Carlo simulations, and second was the assessment of the same based on real economic data. The second aim was achieved by the evaluation of the long-run relationship between three pairs of macroeconomic variables, i.e., Energy Consumption and GDP, Oil Price and GDP, and Broad Money and GDP for BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries using Bounds cointegration test. It was found that information criteria and structured procedures have the same powers for a sample size of 50 or greater. However, BICC and Stepwise are better at small sample sizes. In the light of simulation and real data results, a modified Bounds test with Stepwise model selection procedure may be used as it is strongly theoretically supported and avoids noise in the model selection process.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有