首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月20日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison between single compartment model and recruitment basis function model on NICU patients
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Kyeong Tae Kim ; Jennifer Knopp ; Bronwyn Dixon
  • 期刊名称:IFAC PapersOnLine
  • 印刷版ISSN:2405-8963
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:53
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:16185-16190
  • DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.610
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:AbstractRespiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is commonly diagnosed in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) due to prematurity at birth resulting in surfactant deficiency. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to support breathing of infants with RDS. In this study, respiratory mechanics of 10 invasively ventilated infants from Christchurch Women’s Hospital under standard care are compared with two lung mechanics models validated in adult MV patients. A single compartment model is compared with a parabolic basis function model with dynamic elastance (Edrs) used to capture patient-specific effort. This latter model applies parabolic and linear shapes to identify lung recruitment and distension. The model was fit to 25,657 breaths. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] of elastance from single compartment model(Elung)was 1.51 [0.72 - 2.76] cmH2O/ml, and elastance from recruitment basis function (E1) was 3.42[1.88 - 5.97] cmH2O/ml. Relative breath-to-breath variability(%Δe)was also compared, with median IQR%ΔElungof 0.22 [-9.73 - 12.06] and%Δe1of -0.48[-9.28 - 10.34]. Elungis less sensitive thane1to differences across infants wheree1was also less variable breath-to-breath. The parabolic model thus captured patient condition and the use of Edrs captured patient effort.
  • 关键词:KeywordsNICUelastancebasis functionpulmonary mechanicsmodelingMechanical Ventilation
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有