首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Allied health growth: what we do not measure we cannot manage
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Daniela Solomon ; Nicholas Graves ; Judith Catherwood
  • 期刊名称:Human Resources for Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:1478-4491
  • 电子版ISSN:1478-4491
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:32
  • DOI:10.1186/s12960-015-0027-1
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:

    Background

    Data describing the Australian allied health workforce is inadequate and so insufficient for workforce planning. National health policy reform requires that health-care models take into account future workforce requirements, the distribution and work contexts of existing practitioners, training needs, workforce roles and scope of practice. Good information on this workforce is essential for managing services as demands increase, accountability of practitioners, measurement of outcomes and benchmarking against other jurisdictions. A comprehensive data set is essential to underpin policy and planning to meet future health workforce needs.

    Discussion

    Some data on allied health professions is managed by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency; however, there is limited information regarding several core allied health professions. A global registration and accreditation scheme recognizing all allied health professions might provide safeguards and credibility for professionals and their clients.

    Summary

    Arguments are presented about inconsistencies and voids in the available information about allied health services. Remedying these information deficits is essential to underpin policy and planning for future health workforce needs. We make the case for a comprehensive national data set based on a broad and inclusive sampling process across the allied health population.

  • 关键词:Allied health; Registration; Service provision
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有