首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The impact of physician–nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Nahara A Martínez-González ; Ryan Tandjung ; Sima Djalali
  • 期刊名称:Human Resources for Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:1478-4491
  • 电子版ISSN:1478-4491
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:55
  • DOI:10.1186/s12960-015-0049-8
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:

    Background

    Physician–nurse task shifting in primary care appeals greatly to health policymakers. It promises to address workforce shortages and demands of high-quality, affordable care in the healthcare systems of many countries. This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence about physician–nurse task shifting in primary care in relation to the course of disease and nurses’ roles.

    Methods

    We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, up to August 2012, and the reference list of included studies and relevant reviews. All searches were updated in February 2014. We selected and critically appraised published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

    Results

    Twelve RCTs comprising 22 617 randomized patients conducted mainly in Europe met the inclusion criteria. Nurse-led care was delivered mainly by nurse practitioners following structured protocols and validated instruments in most studies. Twenty-five unique disease-specific measures of the course of disease were reported in the 12 RCTs. While most (84 %) study estimates showed no significant differences between nurse-led care and physician-led care, nurses achieved better outcomes in the secondary prevention of heart disease and a greater positive effect in managing dyspepsia and at lowering cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. The studies were generally small, of varying follow-up episodes and were at risk of biases. Descriptive details about roles, qualifications or interventions were also incomplete or not reported.

    Conclusion

    Trained nurses may have the ability to achieve outcome results that are at least similar to physicians’ for managing the course of disease, when following structured protocols and validated instruments. The evidence, however, is limited by a small number of studies reporting a broad range of disease-specific outcomes; low reporting standards of interventions, roles and clinicians’ characteristics, skills and qualifications; and the quality of studies. More rigorous studies using validated tools could clarify these findings.

  • 关键词:Systematic review; Physician–nurse substitution; Task shifting; Course of disease; Randomized controlled trials; Health policy
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有