摘要：<p class="Judul"><strong>Introduction to The Problem</strong>: Bank Indonesia (BI) has determined the top-up fee of e-money in the Board Governor Member Regulation Number 19/8/PADG/2017 on the National Payment Gateway. This regulation is contrary to article 2 paragraphs 2, article 23 paragraph 1, article 33 paragraph 2 Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency expressly regulates that every person is prohibited from refusing to accept rupiah. Aside from that, the regulation has the potential to cause injustice and discrimination for consumers.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Purpose/Objective Study</strong>: This research aims to analyze whether Bank Indonesia’s actions determine the top-up fee in the form of the Board Governor Member Regulation Number 19/8/PADG/2017 on the National Payment Gateway are in line with its duties and authorities.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Design/Methodology/Approach</strong>: This research uses the normative legal research type with the statute approach to research the Legislation that regulates Bank Indonesia’s authority regarding the policy on a top-up fee issued by Bank Indonesia supervision on implementing its policy.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Findings</strong>: The research concluded that there is an inconsistency authority between Bank Indonesia and Financial Service Authority. Bank Indonesia is authorized to regulate the top-up fee of e-money to ensure consumer protection and the payment system’s smoothness. Moreover, the supervision regarding the e-money top-up fee was in the hand of Bank Indonesia. However, when the consumer suffered loss because of the e-money organizer’s fault, the Financial Service Authority could take the lead to facilitate the customer’s complaint.</p><strong>Paper Type</strong>: Research Article.<p class="Judul"> </p>
