首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Osteosys Primus
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Yong-Chan Ha ; Jun-Il Yoo
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Bone Metabolism
  • 印刷版ISSN:2287-6375
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:28
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:215-221
  • DOI:10.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.215
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
  • 摘要:Background The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measured by the Osteosys Primus ® and the GE Lunar Prodigy ® and to calculate the conversion rate between the 2 devices. Methods The 40 subjects were men and women in aged 20 to 29 years old. All participants were scanned twice on both the Osteosys Primus (OsteoSys) and the GE Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare) DXA systems using the manufacturers’ standard scanning and positioning protocols. Results Compared to the GE Lunar device, the mean Osteosys fat mass was overestimated to be 12.1% (1,776.9 g) in the whole body, 5.1% (163.9 g) in gynoid, and 6.7% (87.2 g) in android. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean BMDs of the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to be 2.3% (0.023 g/cm 2) in the whole body and 3.1% (0.035 g/cm 2) in L1-4. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean lean mass derived by the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to 2.3% (1,045.3 g) in the total body, 3.8% (179.4 g) in arms, and 7.7% (1,104.8 g) in legs, respectively. There were a strong correlation of BMD and body composition between both groups. Conclusions Linear correction equations were developed to ensure comparability of BMD and muscle mass between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy. Importantly, use of equations from previous studies would have increased the discrepancy between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy.
  • 关键词:enAbsorptiometry;photon;Body composition;Bone density;Calibration
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有