摘要：Correction to:
Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-021-89166-8, published online 07 May 2021
The original version of this Article contained an error in the caption of vertical coordinate in Figure 4(b). As a result,
“Alpha diversity index (v)”
now reads:
“Relative abundance of Roseburia (v)”.
The original Figure
4 and accompanying legend appear below.
Figure 4
Relative abundance of
Roseburia in SZ patients showed strong negative correlations with ReHo indexes. (
a) Cuneus_L showed significantly decreased ReHo indexes in SZ compared with the NCs (
p < 0.05). (
b) The residuals of the ReHo indexes in Cuneus_L were significantly negatively correlated with the residuals of the relative abundance of Roseburia in SZ. (
c) Temporal_Sup_R showed significantly decreased ReHo indexes in SZ compared with the NCs (
p < 0.05). (
d) The residuals of the ReHo indexes in Temporal_Sup_R were significantly negatively correlated with the residuals of the relative abundance of
Roseburia in SZ. (
e) Temporal_Mid_R showed significantly decreased ReHo indexes in the SZ compared with the NCs (
p < 0.05). (
f) The residuals of ReHo indexes in Temporal_Mid_R were significantly negatively correlated with the residuals of the relative abundance of
Roseburia in SZ. Sup: superior; Inf: inferior; L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere. **
p < 0.05, FDR corrected, *
p = 0.05, FDR corrected. Figure was generated by a brain network visualization tool of “BrainNet viewer” (Version 1.7,
https://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/), based on MATLAB (Version 2017a).
The original Article has been corrected.
