摘要：Background
Whole-of-community interventions hold promise in addressing childhood obesity. The COMPACT Stakeholder-driven Community Diffusion theory posits that stakeholders’ knowledge of childhood obesity prevention efforts and engagement with the issue contribute to successful intervention implementation. Building on completed formative research and pilot testing, we describe the validation and refinement of knowledge and engagement measures.
Methods
We assessed content validity using a modified Delphi process with science (
n=18) and practice-based (
n=16) experts. Next, we refined the survey based on input from science- and practice-based experts, cognitive response testing, and item analysis of extant survey data. Field testing of the refined survey involved community stakeholders in Greenville County, South Carolina (
n=50), East Boston, Massachusetts (
n=30), and Tucson, Arizona (
n=84) between 2019 and 2020. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Two-week test-retest reliability was assessed among a subsample of 14 paired respondents in South Carolina.
Results
Experts rated existing knowledge domains (
intervention factors,
roles,
sustainability,
problem,
resources) and engagement domains (
dialogue/mutual learning,
flexibility,
influence/power,
leadership/stewardship,
trust) highly for their importance in addressing childhood obesity. Expert input resulted in 11 new knowledge items and 7 new engagement items that mapped onto existing domains. Correspondingly, two domain names were modified:
implementation/sustainability and
trust/trustworthiness. We also eliminated 8 extant items (4 knowledge and 4 engagement) and adapted item language for comprehension and consistency. Further modifications based on CFA results and item analyses resulted in 23 knowledge items across four domains (
roles and
resources merged) and 23 engagement items across five domains. Modified knowledge and engagement scales had adequate fit and strong item factor loadings (most >0.7 and all >0.5). Knowledge (
α=0.86–0.87) and engagement (
α=0.75–0.90) subscales had high internal scale consistency. Knowledge intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest agreement of subscale scores ranged from 0.50 for
intervention factors to 0.86 for
roles/resources. For engagement subscale scores, ICCs ranged from 0.70 for
trust/trustworthiness to 0.96 for
leadership/stewardship.
Conclusions
Findings from this multi-method survey development process increase our confidence of the knowledge and engagement measures’ content validity, construct validity, and reliability.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01158-4.
