标题：Publisher Correction: Association between 9-month isoniazid prophylaxis of latent tuberculosis and severe hepatitis in patients treated with TNF inhibitors
摘要：Correction to:
Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-021-97444-8, published online 09 September 2021.
In the original version of this Article, the image on the right in Table
2 and Table
4 did not display correctly. As a result, each bar of the forest plot did not align with the IRR (95% CI) in the adjacent columns.
Table 2
Risk of severe hepatitis before and after treatment with isoniazid (n = 31). The figure on right hand side is skew (did not match the IRR)
No of events (n)
Follow-up duration (years)
Incidence rate
b (per 100 PYs)
IRR (95% CI)
c
Unexposed periods
25
373.23
6.70
1
Pre-exposure (within 28 day prior to exposure)
1
3.15
3.15
3.81 (0.46–31.59)
Exposed to INH
5
17.93
27.88
5.1 (1.57–16.55)
1–28
< 3
a
–
32.71
4.00 (0.48–33.30)
29–56
0
2.30
0
0
57–84
< 3
a
–
91.14
17.29 (3.11–96.25)
85–168
< 3
a
–
38.28
10.55 (1.90–58.51)
169–252
0
3.65
0
0
253–280
0
1.50
0
0
Washout (within 28 days after INH discontinuation)
0
2.84
0
0
aNumbers less than 3 considered as identifiable.
bIncidence rate was reported as per 100 person-years.
cIncidence rate ratios (IRR) were adjusted for covariates listed in Table 1.
Table 4
Sensitivity analysis of risk of severe hepatitis before and after treatment with isoniazid (excluding death cases) (n = 27). The figure on right side is skew (did not match the results of IRR).
No of events (n)
Follow-up duration (years)
Incidence rate
b (per 100 PYs)
IRR (95% CI)
c
Unexposed periods
22
330.65
6.65
1
Pre-exposure (within 28 day prior to exposure)
0
2.84
0
0
Exposed to INH
5
15.42
32.42
4.75 (1.43–15.86)
1–28
< 3
a
–
35.71
3.15 (0.37–26.46)
29–56
0
2.07
0
0
57–84
< 3
a
–
101.81
14.64 (2.49–86.04)
85–168
< 3
a
–
42.47
9.41 (1.68–52.62)
169–252
0
3.27
0
0
253–280
0
0.61
0
0
Washout (within 28 after INH discontinuation)
0
2.53
0
0
aNumbers less than 3 considered as identifiable.
bIncidence rate was reported as per 100 person-years.
cIncidence rate ratios (IRR) were adjusted for covariates listed in Table 1.
Additionally, legends for Table
2 and Table
4, erroneously included the sentence: “The figure on right hand side is skew (did not match the IRR)” which has now been removed.
The original Table
2 and Table
4 and their accompanying legends appear below.
The original Article has been corrected.
