摘要：Correction to:
Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-018-36519-5, published online 22 January 2019
The original version of this Article contained errors.
In the Results section, under the subheading ‘CH
4 emission and its dependency on the methodology’,
“However, for the cases where all three emission pathways were estimated for the same lake, all the pathways made important contributions to the total flux, with 36.0% coming from the diffusive flux, 38.8% from the storage flux and 27.2% from ebullition (Fig. 5a).”
now reads:
“However, for the cases where all three emission pathways were estimated for the same lake, all the pathways made important contributions to the total flux, with 30.9% coming from the diffusive flux, 35.7% from the storage flux and 33.4% from ebullition (Fig. 5a).”
In addition, in the legend of Figure 5,
“(
a) Contribution of each flux separately and all possible combinations to open water CH
4 emission when all three types of flux were measured (n = 15).”
now reads:
“(
a) Contribution of each flux separately and all possible combinations to open water CH
4 emission when all three types of flux were measured (n = 24).”
The original Article has been corrected.
