首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月13日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence techniques for the prediction of infiltration process
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Balraj Singh ; Parveen Sihag ; Abbas Parsaie
  • 期刊名称:Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes
  • 电子版ISSN:2474-9508
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:109-118
  • DOI:10.1080/24749508.2020.1833641
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Taylor & Francis Group
  • 摘要:ABSTRACTKnowledge of the infiltration process is beneficial in designing and planning of irrigation networks, soil erosion, hydrologic design, and watershed management. In this study, the infiltration process was analyzed using predictive models of artificial neural network (ANN), multi-linear regression (MLR), Random Forest regression (RF), M5P tree, and their performances were compared with the empirical model: Kostiakov model. Field experimental data was implemented for training and testing the above models, and their outcomes were assessed with the help of suitable performance assessment parameters. These models were assessed using a field dataset containing 340 observations, out of which 70% were used for the training purpose and the remaining for the testing. The RF-based models perform better than other models with Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) equal to 0.9963 and 0.9904 for the training and testing stages, correspondingly. ANN, MLR, and M5P model also give a good prediction performance, but the Kostiakov model’s performance is inferior. Sensitivity investigation suggests that the parameters, cumulative time, and moisture content in the soil are the most influential parameters for assessing the cumulative infiltration of soil.
  • 关键词:KEYWORDSInfiltration processartificial intelligence techniqueskostiakov modelnash-sutcliff efficiencymulti-linear regression
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有