首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月13日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail A
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Park, Jung Ho ; Park, Jong Woong ; Wang, Joon Ho
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Korean Fracture Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:1225-1682
  • 出版年度:2008
  • 卷号:21
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:103-109
  • DOI:10.12671/jkfs.2008.21.2.103
  • 语种:Korean
  • 出版社:The Korean Fracture Society
  • 摘要:Purpose

    To evaluate the results of fracture fixation between using Proximal Femoral Nail and using Proximal Femoral Nail A and to analyze the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail A.

    Materials and Methods

    We reviewed 32 patients who suffered from intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital, which were 19 cases of PFN and 13 cases of PFNA. Retrospectively we evaluated mean operation time, amount of bleeding, beginning of ambulation, average union period, changes of neck shaft angle and complication on set of telephone interview and OPD. We also evaluated postoperative capability of function and mobility using 'Social function score' and 'Mobility score'.

    Results

    PFNA showed shorter mean operation time, less bleeding, shorter average union period, earlier ambulation and less change of neck shaft angle than PFN. Although they didn't show statistical difference, postoperative capability of function and mobility showed statistical and mathematical difference on each group.

    Conclusion

    PFNA showed better results of postoperative function and mobility and less complications than PFN. So treatment using PFNA is better method than that of PFN.

  • 关键词:Intertrochanteric fracture; PFN; PFNA
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有