摘要：In Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Volume 25, two articles,entitled"A bibliometric analysis of hazardous waste research from 2001 to 2015"[1] and "Abibliometric analysis for global PM2s research"[2], presented the top cited papers. In the section of The H-index, high cited papers and outperforming authors, Chen et al.[1]noticed that "The top 10 high cited papers of hazardous waste research were listed in Table 4". The table is evidence that proves the methodused in the original paper [l] is not appropriate. Web of Science is designed for researchers to find literatures but not for bibliometric study[3]. Thus bibliometric treatment of data from Web of Science is needed. Papers without searched words in their"front page"[4] could be still found in Web of Science. Papers listed in Table 4. for example "Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey"[5]; "Noninherited risk factors and congenital cardiovascular defects:Current knowledge a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular disease in the young"[6];"Towards a global historical emission inventory for selected PCB congeners-a mass balance approach 2. Emissions"[7]; and"Global hexachlorobenzene emissions"[8] as the top 10 high cited papers on hazardous waste research.In fact there is nothing related to"hazardous waste research"in these papers [5-8].
