期刊名称：Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
印刷版ISSN：1992-8645
电子版ISSN：1817-3195
出版年度：2021
卷号：99
期号：9
语种：English
出版社：Journal of Theoretical and Applied
摘要：The evaluation of serious games is generally a complicated process because there is usually more than one dimension to be evaluated. In our Serious Games evaluation tool, we have four dimensions in each one we have a several well-defined evaluation criteria's. So we intend to use a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method (FMCDM) which has been integrated in order to validate the selection of the different alternatives and the weighting of the multiple criteria involved in our tool.However, even if all methods have the capacity to take into account the imprecision and uncertainty of human judgments, each method has its advantages and disadvantages depending on the context in which it is used. This makes it very difficult to choose one method over another. Moreover, there is no consensus in the scientific community on any particular method.In this paper, we present the use of the fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy ELECTRE methods for ranking the evaluation dimensions / alternatives used in our Serious Games evaluation model in which the fuzzy AHP method was used.These three chosen methods, which adapt perfectly to our context, given its discrete aspect, represent respectively the three categories of FMADM (fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making methods): fuzzy pairwise comparison methods, fuzzy distance based methods and fuzzy outranking methods.The results obtained from the application of these fuzzy methods converge towards the same ranking of dimensions / alternatives.
