首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月17日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Reliability and Validity of A Modified Job Diagnostic Survey for Fresh Graduates Retention
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Carole Serhan ; Haritini Tsangari
  • 期刊名称:Academy of Strategic Management Journal
  • 印刷版ISSN:1544-1458
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:18
  • 期号:5
  • 页码:1-17
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:The DreamCatchers Group, LLC
  • 摘要:Fresh graduates retention is a key ingredient of labor market effectiveness and well-built instruments are necessary to identify its determinants. This study develops an extended version of the widely used Hackman and Oldham’s “Job Diagnostic Surveyâ€, identifying and aiming to bridge its theoretical gaps. The new, 135-item “Modified Job Diagnostic Survey for Retention†implements an integrated framework, with additional “core job dimensionsâ€, “experienced psychological states†and “individual differencesâ€, while incorporating a new scale on “labor market conditionsâ€, to assess the effect of “personal/work outcomes†on retention. Its psychometric properties are tested, using a sample of 630 respondents. Construct validity is evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with Promax rotation. Face validity is examined through reviews by a panel of experts. Reliability of the instrument is estimated with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. The significance of the new instrument is highlighted by filling the void in research involving redesigning jobs while taking into consideration, for the first time, the effect of labor market conditions on fresh graduates’ affective and personal work outcomes. The construct validity shows that it has a five-factor structure where all items are reliable indicators of their corresponding factors. The reliability of the five scales is satisfactory, with acceptable values of Cronbach’s alpha (ranging from 0.656 to 0.901). Thus, the new instrument is a strong, valid and reliable tool for studies on the retention of fresh graduates.
  • 关键词:Fresh Graduates;Job Retention;Core Job Dimensions;Personal/work Outcomes;Instrument Reliability and Validity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有