首页    期刊浏览 2025年08月18日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Genuine, Principled and Tactical Compromise
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Raphael Cohen-Almagor
  • 期刊名称:Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
  • 印刷版ISSN:1731-6375
  • 电子版ISSN:2449-8289
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:30
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:11-31
  • DOI:10.17951/sil.2021.30.2.11-31
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Maria Curie-Sklodowska University
  • 摘要:This essay addresses the concept of compromise. When compromise takes place between two or more parties, reciprocity must be present; that is, the concessions are mutual. Genuine compromise is based on mutual respect and on genuine concessions between the parties. First, the concept of compromise is explained. Next, a relevant distinction is made between principled and tactical compromise. A principled compromise refers to a mutual recognition by each side of the other’s rights, which leads them to make concessions to enable them to meet on a middle ground. It is genuinely made in good faith and both sides reconcile themselves to the results. To illustrate I consider the need for compromise regarding praying area for women at the Western (Wailing) Wall, considered the holiest site in Judaism. The article proceeds by considering the notion of tactical compromise that reflects temporary arrangement reached as a result of constraints related to time. Here, in fact, agents do not give up any of their aims. They do not act in good faith and do not intend to meet their counterpart on a middle ground. Instead, they simply realize that the end could not be achieved at a given point of time, and they aim to reach it stage by stage. The essential component of compromise, namely mutuality, is lacking.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有