首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月22日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Accountability educacional no Brasil: significados, desafios e críticas
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Liduina Maria Gomes ; Eloisa Maia Vidal
  • 期刊名称:Research, Society and Development
  • 电子版ISSN:2525-3409
  • 出版年度:2022
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:1-10
  • DOI:10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27567
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Grupo de Pesquisa Metodologias em Ensino e Aprendizagem em Ciências
  • 摘要:The article proposes to analyze how, from the 1980s onwards, the mechanisms of accountability in Brazilian basic education were forged, considering the emergence and strengthening of large-scale evaluations. It is characterized as a qualitative research, consisting of a literature review, of an exploratory and explanatory nature, with data collected from bibliographic and documentary research, but does not exhaust the production of the field. In order to understand the implementation of Brazilian public policy in the area of basic education, it is essential to understand how the federative pact is organized in the country, considering the functions attributed to the Union, states, Federal District and municipalities and how the idea of the State-evaluator and the managerial model that permeate the neoliberal ideology are assimilated and disseminated in the public administration. The creation, in Brazil, of large-scale assessment mechanisms dates back to the 1980s, with the Basic Education Evaluation System and based on changes made to the exam, so that it can support the creation of accountability mechanisms, implementing accountability policies, which start to populate the reality of Brazilian education systems and public schools. The creation of the Basic Education Development Index, in 2007, allowed the projection and monitoring of goals that are necessary to achieve the desired results and since then, large-scale evaluations have acquired prominence in educational policy, and various mechanisms of accountability are being created.
  • 关键词:Basic education;Accountability;Federative pact;Large-scale evaluations;Brazil.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有