期刊名称：Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS)
电子版ISSN：2619-7219
出版年度：2014
卷号：2
页码：103-117
语种：English
出版社：Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Letters, University of Santo Tomas
摘要：This study examines the types of hedging devices and the similarities/differences in their uses in Philippine newspaper editorials. Using a mixed paradigm design, the study examined 30 editorials taken from three leading newspapers in the Philippines: the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the Manila Bulletin, and the Philippine Star. Hedges were categorized by adapting and modifying the classification of hedges in different studies and were then analyzed based on the study of Hyland (1997) and Filipinos’ interpersonal communication by Worthington (2010, as cited in Labor de Guzman, 2011). Findings show that nearly 50 percent of the hedges in the editorials are references to official reports or authorities, while a little over than 30 percent of the hedges consist of modals and adverbs. These show how incorporating other sources of information help minimize the editors’ responsibility in facing negative reactions from readers. If ever there are problems in one of the editorial statements, the editors can point to the readers references cited in the text. The modals used also show approximation, distancing, and vagueness. They may be used to avoid questions from the readers, lessen the force of statements, and control the commitment of the editorial in its claim. Furthermore, some adverbs are used in decreasing the certainty of statements, concealing exact figures, and distancing the writer’s presence. These adverbs may be used when specific statements cannot be made because of inadequacy of information or when showing respect or politeness. The study shows that hedges are used for effective discourse, especially in regulating the strength or impact of a statement.
